THE DESCENT



It's nice to see the monsters from LORD OF THE RINGS can still get work.

They are at the center and are the big reveal of THE DESCENT. And while I would like to say they are the star of the show, that's just not true. The real star of the show is the massive underground cavern where the film spends most of it's time. And I have plenty of opinions on that.

The film starts off as a little girl gleefully watches as her mother nearly gets creamed white water rafting. The mother doesn't but the kid does shortly thereafter, along the emotionless father. At this point, a young guy and his girlfriend sat next to me in the theatre and asked me if they missed anything. It's amusing to be able to answer, "Yeah, a six-year old brat just got a giant metal pole right through her melon." They looked disturbed by this information, as is the girl's onscreen mother, Sara (Shauna Macdonald - SPOOKS, or MI-5 as it's called in the States). She's the only survivor and as you can imagine, she's a bit battered emotionally.

One year later, she agrees to a weekend getaway (cue the horror film "uh-oh") exploring some underground caverns with her best friend Juno (Natalie Mendoza - CODE 46) and several of other extreme sports loving women. Now, here is where I should point out to everyone where many people may be misled by the premise of THE DESCENT. A lot has been made about "sexy girls battling monsters in a cave" and so on. On the contrary, the film does not go to any lengths at all to increase the sex appeal of the cast. While I am a great admirer of the fairer sex, it was a bit refreshing that for once, filmmakers avoided turning the movie into an underground COYOTE UGLY. Meaning no offense of course, most of the characters are quite average-looking. In other words, the film is more interested in character and wits than it is in cosmetic beauty. The rest you've heard is just PR.

A lot of time is spent here pretending to give the characters loads of depth, which works fine enough, and increasing the feelings of isolation and despair felt by Sarah. Sarah's pathos plays into the second, more visceral half of the film, to varying degrees. It also seems to have more bearing in the UK cut of the film than the American cut, which had minor alterations to the ending.

The group descends several miles down into a mysterious uncharted cavern. And here is my big gripe. It's not a gripe about the quality of the film so much as it is the characters.

You see, I've come to realize that the world is not merely filled with stupid people. No, that would be too simplistic. Rather, the world is filled with several different levels of stupid people. There are the normal stupid people, the ones who pass by life in their own little bubble of ignorance. There are the delusional stupid people, who believe anything they are told by media and government, and who probably think that the ghost of a little boy really does make a cameo in THREE MEN AND A BABY. And then there are the reckless, bat-shit crazy stupid people. Now, I'm not talking about people who go skydiving, or base jumping. Hell, I always wish I could have tried that myself. I'm talking about the people who decide to go out exploring life-threatening terrain, with no help, no preparation and minimal supplies. It requires people to be half stupid and half psychotic. Such are the dumbasses, one in particular, in THE DESCENT.

I believe that millions upon millions of years ago, we finally emerged out of the caves and explored the world at large. It is a special - and I do mean "special" - kind of person who decides to return to said caves. As the group squeezes through tunnels so thin, Mary-Kate Olsen would have to take a deep breath to get through, parts of the cavern system begin to collapse behind them.

The caverns are beautiful, but they are also untamed. So, the group has no idea where they are heading. If they come to a clear passageway, all the better, because they are just as likely to encounter a dead end, or a two hundred foot drop. The caverns are definitely the star of the show, as I said earlier, and they are cause for the most nail-biting moments of the film. The monsters are just gravy.

Oh yes, the monsters. As I joked in the first sentence of this review, they do look like they came out of the LORD OF THE RINGS trilogy. From a distance, you'd think it was Andy Serkis himself, crawling around. Up close, they look like those goblin/orc things, but this time naked as the Lord made them and sporting skin as pale as... well, people who spend too much time indoors watching LORD OF THE RINGS I imagine. They also gurgle like something out of Sigourney Weaver's nightmares and scream like an Aphex Twin video.

My kidding aside, the monsters are actually pretty creepy in this film and I hope American audiences give them a chance. At this point, I wonder if many of my fellow countrymen will wonder if THE DESCENT is nothing more than a rip-off of last year's film, THE CAVE. In case you are, let me tell you right now, it isn't. Although most of THE DESCENT takes place in the Appalachian Mountains, it is a British-financed film that actually opened in the U.K. a month in advance of THE CAVE's U.S. berth. In finding a U.S. audience, that will be THE DESCENT's biggest hurdle to overcome - that even though it was first and is in fact a better film, audiences may feel like they've seen some of it before.

The film is filled with adrenalin-draining moments and really should be seen in a theatre to get the full effect. For most of the film, the audience has that worrisome feeling in the pit of their stomach and that tingling at the back of their spine. Those looking for gore will be happy to know THE DESCENT delivers, but it isn't the main focus as it was in say, Alexandre Aja's HILLS HAVE EYES remake.

The flaws the film has are few and only worth a brief mention. Probably the biggest is that even at 99 minutes, THE DESCENT goes on a bit too long and could have probably stood to have another ten minutes cut from the running time. A good area for some trimming were a few minor character points brought up early on that don't seem to go anywhere.

THE DESCENT is a good, solid horror film that is primarily interested in scares. In it's serious, downbeat approach, it is in many ways the opposite of Marshall's gloriously fun DOG SOLDIERS. It won't completely cure to the movie-watching blues, but it's a damn fine start.

Oh yeah, and for the cave dwellers out there - you're still bat-shit crazy.


The above review applies to the U.S. theatrical cut of THE DESCENT.

----------

Comment on this review in our (terrorist free) !






















- Scott W. Davis



WHAT YOU SAID [VIEW]

spiral said
This is, indeed, a great film!

I enjoyed the review... :)
VIDEODROME said
Nice review. I've been thinking about checking this movie out.
Juan Rayo said
I really, really liked this. Not a "classic" maybe but a solid, entertaining horror movie. Mr. Davis' is a great review, of course, and the only part I disagree with is the nonsense about the cast looking "regular". I am sorry Mr. Davis', but that JUNO -Natalie Mendoza- llady is really, really hot.

I am in fact confused by the lack of comment about the movie here. Sure it's not the enormously fun "Dog Soldiers" but I believe Mr. Marshall gave us a nice litle movie. Maybe it didn't quite catch in the US? What did you guys and gals of the forums think? Here's my take on it, warning, SPOILERS HEAVY


Spoilers ahead


BUNCH of spoilers ahead


"Vader is luke's father" type spoiler ahead.


Still here? great, here we go.


spiral said
Interesting ideas, Juan...

Personally, I think that the claustraphobia within the caves (combined with an actual threat of vicious cave-dwellers) brought out a lot of pent-up, bubbling beneath the surface stuff. Is the morale of the story something about us all being cave-dwellers, if stripped of a very thin veneer of social-conditioning?

Of course, you could be right about it all being a metaphor, or delusion, of the grieving main character... possibly the aggressor, herself.

I wonder what the director''s commentary has to say about all of this, if there is such on the DVD? (I can't remember, off-hand).

Either way, I heard on the horror grapevine that there was an alternative ending floating around for The Descent...
Juan Rayo said
QUOTE (spiral;18809)
I wonder what the director''s commentary has to say about all of this, if there is such on the DVD? (I can't remember, off-hand).
Either way, I heard on the horror grapevine that there was an alternative ending floating around for The Descent...


Hey Spiral. You know, I have been trying to find this "alternative ending" in the net with no luck. Still, maybe I am not missing much, since I saw the "UK ending" that, according to most people, is way better than the USA version. Wonder why they felt they had to change the ending at the other side of the ocean? It's not like the US audiences can't cope with an "unhappy" ending. Or can't they?

I would REALLY like to hear director commentaries for this as well. Gonna have to get me the DVD I guess.
JohnShaft said
QUOTE (Juan Rayo;18807)
I am in fact confused by the lack of comment about the movie here. Sure it's not the enormously fun "Dog Soldiers" but I believe Mr. Marshall gave us a nice litle movie. Maybe it didn't quite catch in the US? What did you guys and gals of the forums think?

Hi Juan. I'd love to comment but have yet to see it. I do have it waiting though, so I should see it in the next couple of weeks, and will be sure to comment then. I'm trying to pick up on my movie viewing atm.

As for Neil Marshall, just on DOG SOLDIERS alone, I'm a big fan. It's no small deal to produce a movie that good and well received in this country, and I'm sure he's going to go from strength to strength. The majority of opinions I've read on THE DESCENT heaped praise on it, with a few dissenting "what's all the fuss about"'s, which there will always be.

QUOTE Mr. Davis' is a great review, of course, and the only part I disagree with is the nonsense about the cast looking "regular".
I must say nearly every opinion I've read on the movie has also pointed towards an ordinary-looking cast (and hell that's being kind to some opinions). I just think it's pretty sad that we have to point out an ordinary cast because it is so out of the ordinary. When movies get cast because the person can act, rather than because of how good they look, we might actually start turning out some decent stuff.

And
NOTE TO ALL: The Spoiler tags still work. Just put around it. It does save somebody glancing over something, or seeing something out of the corner of their eye. And it's also useful to continue a post after a spoiler so we know what we can look at.
Juan Rayo said
Lol, I like it how pretty much EVERYTHING I wrote was spoilerish. Thanks for fixing it Mr. Shaft!.

Been thinking more and more about the movie and I like it more and more too. Guess it grows on you.
JohnShaft said
QUOTE (Juan Rayo;18848)
Lol, I like it how pretty much EVERYTHING I wrote was spoilerish. Thanks for fixing it Mr. Shaft!.
I had no idea if it did mate, and I didn't want to find out with me watching it in a week or two. ;)

QUOTE Been thinking more and more about the movie and I like it more and more too. Guess it grows on you.
Marshall's two for two in that regard then methinks. DOG SOLDIERS defnitely had a bit of that about it. My review wasn't completely glowing but, as predicted, it grew on me too. Now if that isn't the sign of a good film (and filmmaker) I don't know what is...
jigsaw said
first off, i just want to say that THE DESCENT was, i suppose, quite a good flick, once you piece together the caracters, the origins, the plot and the details you find a way to keep up with the film. you truly realise how a life and death experience hundreds of feet underground can turn a sassy group of british/irish/eastern/american/northern girls into demented subterranean killing machines.

a lot of people are comparing it to THE CAVE (2005) but don't listen, THE CAVE is vastly different to THE DESCENT, in the cave, there is a team of top-class profesionnal explorers with high-tech gear, computers, G.P.Ss and scuba equipment, whereas THE DESCENT is a group of girls trying to amuse themselves. the creatures in THE CAVE are bat-like, poisonous, can fly, have super-stength and transmit a virus ( which infects others to carry on their DNA ) but crawlers are simply homo-sapiens who have evolved to live underground ( they don't seem very strong, in the end they win but, hell, they lose about 15 or 20 crawlers just to get a few girls !!)

the crawlers aren't that impressive if you ask me, but it's nice to see that the actors who played the "orks" i L. OF THE RINGS still have jobs(ha ha) . the crawlers all seem to be male except for the one apparent female who attacks out of maternal vengeance. it's just another film in which everyone dies off one by one except in this one there are no survivors( sarah halucinates and dies happy) another thing i find annoying is , in the end, sarah believes that juno murdered beth (which she did, accidentally) and instead of asking "why? what? how? and did you do it on purpose?" she decides to stick an axe in her leg and leave her to get eaten
few flaws few scores good film anyway watch if you have the time
jigsaw said
by the way, i'm still trying to find this so-called "alternative ending" to THE DESCENT, i doubt its existence.

stupid lying bastard grapevine.
Juan Rayo said
QUOTE (jigsaw;19587)
by the way, i'm still trying to find this so-called "alternative ending" to THE DESCENT, i doubt its existence.

stupid lying bastard grapevine.


Do not dispair, for it EXISTS!
The question of course is, "is it worth it?". IMHO no. I hunted around for it, found it, watched it, got a big MEH out of me. And I don't think it makes for such a big difference in the end.
ebowens said
i love this movie it made me jump , laugh and made me feel like i knew the people . i also makes you think twice before going down a cave ! i think it was a clever movie which makes you think of what you would do in that situation with your friends .... i enjoyed it and would love to see a 2nd one come out :D
Beast said
The greatest, most psychologically horrifying film since 'The Blair Witch Project'. My third favorite horror film ever, and among my favorite films of all time. A+

Seen It? Tell Us What You Think




DIRECTOR

Neil Marshall

CAST

Shauna McDonald
Natalie Mendoza
Alex Reid
Saskia Mulder
Nora-Jane Noone
Myanna Buring

RELEASE DATE

2005

REVIEWER

Scott W. Davis

REVIEW DATE

8th August 2006 - 12:38AM

Links

U.S. Official Website (Lionsgate)
UK Official Website (Pathe)

Trailers

UK Teaser
U.S. Trailer

Taglines

  • Afraid of the Dark? You Will Be.
  • Face Your Deepest Fear

Trivia

  • The cast members were taken to a rock-climbing center in Derbyshire to help prepare them for filming.
  • The hospital scene contains 30 extras.
  • After we see Sarah's husband and the male extras in the hospital scene at the beginning, there are no male characters for the rest of the film.
  • According to the audio commentary on the special edition DVD, there was a exact replica made of Nora-Jane Noone and after the movie was finished, she got to keep the head of the doll and put it in her mothers freezer as a joke.
  • This film's Poster Art is borrowed from a portrait photograph by Philippe Halsman of Salvador Dali, entitled Salvador Dali In Voluptate Mors. (The photo itself was inspired by surrealist Dali's gouache Female Bodies as a Skull painting) This same imagery was also used for the SILENCE OF THE LAMBS poster.


the Last 10 Movie Reviews by

Scott W. Davis


Read more of Scott's Reviews HERE