THE LORD OF THE RINGS: THE RETURN OF THE KING
NOTE: The following review refers to the LORD OF THE RINGS films in their theatrical formats only. I have not yet seen the Extended Versions, nor have I read the books so this review is based solely on their theatrical merit.
On Tuesday night, I went to the movies to see how Tom Cruise fared as an American turned samurai. I figured that if I wanted to see THE RETURN OF THE KING, I should probably see it tomorrow as it would be my only chance in a couple weeks, before everyone else has talked about it ad nauseum.
“So, if I wanted to see the 7:00 show tomorrow night, when should I be here?”
“Actually sir, the 7:00 is already almost sold out.”
“You’re kidding! 24 hours in advance?”
“Yes,” the ticket taker responded in that look that I knew too well from my own job. It’s the look that says, “How many times am I going to have to explain this? And will I be able to restrain myself from stabbing someone in the eye with my ball point pen?”
Not wanting to give the poor girl a hard time, I said, “Well, how is the 8:00 show doing?” “We have some of those.” “Great, give me one ticket and I’ll try to make it tomorrow.” I did, 45 minutes early. I was pretty sleepy and so I woke myself up with a good ten minutes of shooting virtual terrorists in the arcade. A half hour early, I figured I’d go into the theatre and should be able to find a decent seat. I did, but just barely. The theatre was already three quarters packed and it was only providence that said my trusty seat in third row center was unoccupied. Looking around, I saw a lot of people in groups. Some of them obviously had been waiting since 2001 for this very moment. It all had a festive quality to it and it was refreshing. I didn’t have a huge hard-on for LORD OF THE RINGS, but I certainly thought the first two films were very good. Spirits were very high. This is the enthusiasm that should have met the STAR WARS prequels, if they hadn’t proved themselves to be such mediocre forms of entertainment. So I sat there, slightly awakened by the crowd and hoped that I would remain attentive for THE RETURN OF THE KING.
Our ten hour journey is finally complete. THE LORD OF THE RINGS: THE RETURN OF THE KING is by far the best of the series, giving fans everything they would hope for and more. It represents the ultimate culmination in a trilogy that was nearly flawless. But the emphasis there is nearly.
It goes without saying that if you haven’t seen the first two films, this isn’t going to make a lick of sense. They’ll be forced to give up the second our heroes begin talking to a tree. This is more one complete film than three separate ones. We are treated to a brief prologue showing the origin of Gollum (Andy Serkis), a scene which was also used in Ralph Bakshi’s old LORD OF THE RINGS animated film (the only scene of the film I’ve watched, to be honest). After that, it picks up immediately where THE TWO TOWERS left off. Strider (Viggo Mortensen), long since outed as Aragorn, the heir to Gondor, continues to make nice with the people of Rohan. Gandalf the White (Sir Ian McKellan) is still a distant and guarded version of his more cheerful Grey self. Legolas (Orlando Bloom) and Gimli (John Rhys-Davies) bond, although they don’t have as much to do this time around. The king of Gondor honors his debts as Eowyn (Miranda Otto) pines for Aragorn. Merry and Pippin rejoin the group, jubilant over their victory at Eisengard. Their victory is short-lived as Pippin stumbles upon Sauron’s plans for further invasions in Middle Earth. This leads Gandalf and Pippin off together as the remaining group prepares for another battle.
Meanwhile, Frodo (Elijah Wood), Samwise (Sean Astin, still the best performance of his career) and Smeagol continue to make their way through Mordor. As Frodo looks more and more worn down by the burden of his travels, he is unaware of the plotting around him. Smeagol has lost his battle of wills against his alter ego, Gollum. Now, he tries to pit Frodo against his old friend Sam, while leading them to certain death.
Lady Arwen (Liv Tyler) leaves the elf clan’s journey into the west, as a vision tells her there may be more to her fate than she previously realized. Through her pleading, Elrond (Hugo Weaving) agrees to restore the Sword of Gondor to its rightful heir, even though it may cost Arwen her life.
All of this is covered within the first half hour of this mammoth film that does not stop for a second. I will say this, for the entire 3 hour and 21 minute running time, I was never bored and if anything, I was more alert at the end of the film than I was at the beginning. Jackson creates a wonderful and brisk pace. The film is original in its storytelling and never panders to the audience. Smeagol never falls prey to Jar Jar syndrome, becoming comic relief to the increasingly dark proceedings. Everything moves at a natural progression. The screenplay for this outing is one of the best in recent memory and only MYSTIC RIVER comes close to this brilliance this year.
The performances are also top notch, the best we’ve seen in epic filmmaking in a long time. Many of the participants, including Wood, Mortensen, Astin and Otto give career best performances. Even Tyler tops her amazing turn in STEALING BEAUTY.
But the real star of the show here is Peter Jackson. And this is the part that gives us horror and cult film lovers the warm and fuzzies. This is a man from New Zealand who spent years creating one of the most violent alien invasion comedies ever, the aptly named BAD TASTE, only to follow it up with the even nastier MEET THE FEEBLES and BRAINDEAD (a.k.a. DEAD-ALIVE). He made a dramatic turn, revealing a completely new directing style in HEAVENLY CREATURES, a film I still consider his personal best. We didn’t have too much reason to believe that Jackson would make it much bigger than his strangely addicting film THE FRIGHTENERS. Then, he pitched this idea to Miramax who balked and then to New Line who immediately ran with the idea. Amazing! Nothing less than divine providence! Now our beloved maestro is being rightly called a cinematic visionary, one who is now tackling the original 800 lb. Gorilla, KING KONG. And he still remembers his fans, talking about doing another zombie picture. Not bad for a guy who just fifteen years ago was ingesting his own vomit on screen.
He has created a beautiful and epic film, in every sense of the word. The incredible exteriors and wide open spaces courtesy of cinematographer Andrew Lesnie (BABE) is unmatched by anything I’ve seen in years. I could just look at those shots and weep at their beautiful composition. Art direction, production design, set decoration and costumes are all amazing. The battle scenes themselves are the most amazing achievement I’ve seen. It’s proof that CGI can work when it’s grouped with clarity of purpose and artistic ingenuity. They are the new barometer for which epic battles should be judged. BRAVEWHAT? BEN-WHO?
But even I have to admit there is quite a bit of hyperbole going around about the LORD OF THE RINGS films, and coming from me that’s saying something. I was going to list a series of them here, but in looking at them I didn’t see the point. I do suggest you go to Rotten Tomatoes, MovieWeb or the IMDB to see some of the things critics from all walks of life are saying. Much of it is praise that is well deserved. Jackson has indeed created an amazing film. This film deserves to be remembered as a crowning achievement in epic storytelling, even if my money is still on LAWRENCE OF ARABIA as the end-all be-all winner of this one. Is it a perfect trilogy? Close, and certainly as good as we’re likely to see for many years to come. No faulting Jackson for creating a stirring, sweeping, moving achievement.
But let’s just step back a second. There are a couple things where, while I don’t want to be the nit-picker, I can’t help it. There is the absence of Christopher Lee to deal with for one thing. Yes, Saruman's fate is in the book and Lee’s scenes are said to be restored for the Extended Version DVD. But what about now? We just stumbled upon the ruins of Eisengard and we’re meant to assume what? That he was crushed by a boulder while running away like a little girl? This is not the ranting of a Christopher Lee fan, although I am that. No, this is just continuity. It drops the character completely and we’re supposed to wait until the four-hour plus DVD just to find out what happened to him?
There is also a point in just one of the incredible battles where a friendly force shows up out of the blue. Now, I seem to recall this particular group from reading bits of THE HOBBIT years ago, but I don’t think I’ve heard any mention of them in either of the theatrical films. Their sudden appearance, while breathtaking in its beauty should almost be accompanied by a flashing neon sign reading “Deux Ex Machina.”
And then there’s the color. Sorry folks, but while I loved the images some of the battle scenes, and anything with the Elves looked incredible, there are many scenes that were purposely drained of color and it didn’t look completely great. These are most apparent as Frodo, Sam and Smeagol move through Mordor. And yes, grays and browns are appropriate given the rocky molten terrain. Still, the color correction that hurt parts of UNDERWORLD and the last two MATRIX films also show up here, although in not such an intrusive manner.
But one of the bigger problems is the epilogue. Not the climax, the epilogue. I will not say much about the ending of RETURN OF THE KING except to say that there is an amazing climax, a wonderful wrap-up and then… it just keeps going. And yes, I am sure all of this was present in the book. But while I’m happy Jackson has stayed true to the source material, that is a book and this isn’t. There is really not much reason the film could not have ended at the wrap-up, with a three minute closing narration, perhaps by Cate Blanchett who opened the narration in THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING. I’m sure many people with whom I shared my theatrical experience will call the film “perfect.” This is after all, their baby. But I was there, and even I heard them snickering or saying, “Come on” as the screen faded back in for the umpteenth time. As I said earlier, THE RETURN OF THE KING is never boring, but it is just slightly overlong.
Still, Jackson has created a wonderful and mythical trilogy. A huge achievement that says big doesn’t have to be stupid, that epics can take from tradition without falling into cliché, that special effects can really be special but that the true force of the story is in the telling of it. And for that, I am eternally grateful that this hometown boy has made good.
Now, watch me finally see the Extended Versions and say, “Hey, maybe they are perfect.” Let’s save that story for another time.
- Scott W. Davis
WHAT YOU SAID [VIEW]
Caleb Goodwin saidExcellent review! You reflected my feelings of the trilogy perfectly. The trilogy is not perfect but an accomplishment that will probably not be matched for many years.
Spoiler*********************************************
My main complaint with the film came also with the multiple endings. In my opinion it should have wrapped up with the crowning of the king segment and the bowing of everyone to the Hobbits. I found that segment to be the most poetic of the seemingly endless supply of endings.
End************************************************spoiler
I am not one for happy endings and the endings jest kept getting happier...and happier...and happier.
I agree that the dropping of the Saruman confrontation was a BAD choice. I am sure that I am not alone in my absolute hate for Saruman. Truthfully I was looking forward to Saruman getting his most of all. I guess I will have to check out the extended edition for once. They should have clipped a multiple ending and put Saruman's fate in. In the end King was an excellent ending of an epic trilogy. I still prefer the first, but I liked King better than Two Towers. Maybe one day I will get around to seeing the extended editions of all of them.
No one but Jackson could have brought these films to life. I am happy for him yet at the same time I want Bad Taste 2 or Braindead 2 damnit!!
Scott W. Davis said
Spoiler*********************************************
My main complaint with the film came also with the multiple endings. In my opinion it should have wrapped up with the crowning of the king segment and the bowing of everyone to the Hobbits. I found that segment to be the most poetic of the seemingly endless supply of endings.
End************************************************spoiler
I am not one for happy endings and the endings jest kept getting happier...and happier...and happier.
I agree that the dropping of the Saruman confrontation was a BAD choice. I am sure that I am not alone in my absolute hate for Saruman. Truthfully I was looking forward to Saruman getting his most of all. I guess I will have to check out the extended edition for once. They should have clipped a multiple ending and put Saruman's fate in. In the end King was an excellent ending of an epic trilogy. I still prefer the first, but I liked King better than Two Towers. Maybe one day I will get around to seeing the extended editions of all of them.
No one but Jackson could have brought these films to life. I am happy for him yet at the same time I want Bad Taste 2 or Braindead 2 damnit!!
QUOTE Originally posted by Caleb Goodwin@Dec 21 2003, 09:18 PM
Excellent review! You reflected my feelings of the trilogy perfectly. The trilogy is not perfect but an accomplishment that will probably not be matched for many years.
Spoiler*********************************************
My main complaint with the film came also with the multiple endings. In my opinion it should have wrapped up with the crowning of the king segment and the bowing of everyone to the Hobbits. I found that segment to be the most poetic of the seemingly endless supply of endings.
End************************************************spoiler
Excellent review! You reflected my feelings of the trilogy perfectly. The trilogy is not perfect but an accomplishment that will probably not be matched for many years.
Spoiler*********************************************
My main complaint with the film came also with the multiple endings. In my opinion it should have wrapped up with the crowning of the king segment and the bowing of everyone to the Hobbits. I found that segment to be the most poetic of the seemingly endless supply of endings.
End************************************************spoiler
Yep, and that was precisely the "wrap-up" I was talking about. Everything else could have been narration. But anything after that moment paled in comparison.
I too was thrilled with Jacksons take on LOTR, the third installment was just as good if not better than the previouse two. I am a lifelong fan of everything Tolkien, and I feel that The Hobbit is acctually his best work. I have mixed emotions on whether I would like to see Jackson take a shot at The Hobbit as well. The actor Ian? Played Bilbo, is a great actor but very wrong for the role. I would hate to see him as a younger Bilbo. I fear Jackson would try this if givin the chance.
I also yearn for Brain dead/Dead Alive II or best of all bests Bad Taste II.
Bring Back the "Boy's" Dammit! :devil:
jester21 said
I also yearn for Brain dead/Dead Alive II or best of all bests Bad Taste II.
Bring Back the "Boy's" Dammit! :devil:
Awesome movie. I was very happy with this, and look forward to what Peter Jackson does in the future.
Alex said
Easily the best film of the past 20 years. Look at Godfather III. Ugh! As for the "multiple endings", go read Tolkien. He devotes almost 100 pages to them.
Only fools who think that this film is about a big battle, rather than about the loss of a whole world, would complain about the long goodbyes. Yes, cutting "The Scouting of the Shire" and the end of Saruman hurts, but it's really only one more (painful) loss story. Live with it. Jackson was right again.
42nd Street Freak said
Only fools who think that this film is about a big battle, rather than about the loss of a whole world, would complain about the long goodbyes. Yes, cutting "The Scouting of the Shire" and the end of Saruman hurts, but it's really only one more (painful) loss story. Live with it. Jackson was right again.
Oh nooooo...can't agree on ending the film at Aragorn's crowning. The rest was essential and very moving. The fault witht the 'multiple' endings is actually down to the overlong fade-outs. The screen stayed black too long and people thought it was the end each time, esp the one after the boat sailed away. They should have faded out then faded back in right away.
My biggest fault was the loss of Saruman. very silly choice, esp as they added extra stuff that was not in the book (which I don't mind actually, but if you are going to add non-Tolkien stuff then removing important Tolkien stuff is hard to defend).
But saying that, the rest of the film was wonderful and it was a real pleasure to see the slow, thoughtful and emotionally powerful finale. Where most films would have ended, Jackson and Co kept it going and gave this a respecful and suitably sedate ending.
The main battle was a truly superb bit of cinema and a brilliant advert for how CGI should be used and how it can bring to life something that is so huge and so fantastical. There were a few dodgy CGI scenes (the Legolas attack sequence on the Elephant had some unsure moments), but given what was being created it was a truly wonderful achievement.
Roll on that extended DVD...That would i expect include something leading up to the arrival of the Eagles with Gandalf, as that event did seem to appear out of nowhere.
Oh, one very bad mistake in the effects though...Did any of you notice the reverse shot near the start where they ride towards Edoras and the camera pans over the City?? It was obviously a shot going the other way played bacwards as the flags were blowing backwards, and...THE SMOKE WAS GOING BACK *INTO* THE CHIMNEY, UNTIL IT VANISHED! LOL!
Overall though this was an exciting, powerful and quite wonderful movie experience.
jasonvoorheesX said
My biggest fault was the loss of Saruman. very silly choice, esp as they added extra stuff that was not in the book (which I don't mind actually, but if you are going to add non-Tolkien stuff then removing important Tolkien stuff is hard to defend).
But saying that, the rest of the film was wonderful and it was a real pleasure to see the slow, thoughtful and emotionally powerful finale. Where most films would have ended, Jackson and Co kept it going and gave this a respecful and suitably sedate ending.
The main battle was a truly superb bit of cinema and a brilliant advert for how CGI should be used and how it can bring to life something that is so huge and so fantastical. There were a few dodgy CGI scenes (the Legolas attack sequence on the Elephant had some unsure moments), but given what was being created it was a truly wonderful achievement.
Roll on that extended DVD...That would i expect include something leading up to the arrival of the Eagles with Gandalf, as that event did seem to appear out of nowhere.
Oh, one very bad mistake in the effects though...Did any of you notice the reverse shot near the start where they ride towards Edoras and the camera pans over the City?? It was obviously a shot going the other way played bacwards as the flags were blowing backwards, and...THE SMOKE WAS GOING BACK *INTO* THE CHIMNEY, UNTIL IT VANISHED! LOL!
Overall though this was an exciting, powerful and quite wonderful movie experience.
FREAK u UGLY MOTHER :censored: son of a :censored: cow!!!!!!! those films were the best the money and effort put into these films was worth it's risk u shuld show jackson sum respect :angry: !!!!!!!
DIRECTOR
Peter JacksonCAST
Sir Ian McKellenElijah Wood
Sean Astin
Billy Boyd
Orlando Bloom
Kevin Conway
Hugo Weaving
Brad Dourif
Martin Csoka
Bernard Hill
Sir Ian Holm
Christopher Lee
Dominic Monaghan
Viggo Mortensen
John Rhys-Davies
John Noble
Liv Tyler
Karl Urban
Cate Blanchett
David Wenham
RELEASE DATE
2003REVIEWER
Scott W. DavisREVIEW DATE
21st December 2003 - 6:23PMTaglines
- The journey ends
Trivia
- Stuart Townsend (QUEEN OF THE DAMNED, LEAGUE OF EXTRAORDINARY GENTLEMEN) was set to play Aragorn, but was let go two months into filming because director Peter Jackson felt the character should be played by someone older.
- THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING, THE TWO TOWERS and THE RETURN OF THE KING were filmed simulatenously.
- Additional scenes filmed in New Zealand in 2003, in much the same way as new sequences were shot for THE TWO TOWERS prior to that film's release.
- Sean Astin's daughter, Alexandra Astin, makes a cameo towards the end.
- While filming the trilogy, Viggo Mortensen got so into character that during a conversation, Peter Jackson referred to him as "Aragorn" for over half an hour without him realizing it.
- The character Shelob, (Gollum refers to her as "she"), originally appeared in the book, THE TWO TOWERS, but it was decided that she should be placed in the third film as not much happens to Frodo and Sam in the third book.
- The battle scenes, which reportedly contain over 200,000 digital participants, are so huge that an extra room had to be built onto Weta Digital's effects facility to house all the computer equipment needed to render the scenes.
- Viggo Mortensen estimates that, during the course of filming the entire trilogy and including all takes, he killed every stuntman on the production at least fifty times.
- Royd Tolkien, the author's great-grandson, cameos as a Gondorian Ranger.
the Last 10 Movie Reviews by
Scott W. Davis
Shock-O-Rama
Bone Sickness
The Descent
The Nun
Return of the Living Dead: Necropolis
Hostel
2001 Maniacs
A History of Violence
Bad Reputation
Evil Breed: The Legend Of Samhain
Bone Sickness
The Descent
The Nun
Return of the Living Dead: Necropolis
Hostel
2001 Maniacs
A History of Violence
Bad Reputation
Evil Breed: The Legend Of Samhain
Read more of Scott's Reviews HERE
