DUCK! THE CARBINE HIGH MASSACRE



DUCK! THE CARBINE HIGH MASSACRE Movie Review
by PROFESSOR DARK


"DUCK!"... away from this movie!

Since my buddy DEVILMAN had his fill of shot-on-video low budget American movies with THE ATTACK OF THE COCKFACED KILLER (reviewed elsewhere), I volunteered to step in and review DUCK! THE CARBINE HIGH MASSACRE for him. Not having reliable access online myself, this is not something that I get a chance to do often, but anything to help save DEVILMAN's delicate sensabilities (yeah, right).

Let's get a few things out of the way first shall we. If you are looking for graphic horror, lots of gore, sex / nudity, or the like, then you'll need to look somewhere else. This movie is NOT for you. Well, there is alittle gore (which we'll talk about later) but there's no horror, there's no sex, and only four... count 'em, only four exposed female breasts to be had. So, if you're looking for any of the above listed material, please move along because there's nothing to see here. Now, if you're still with me and still interested, here's what you can look forward to if you pop in this particular DVD.

DUCK! came out originally in 2000 after the real life Columbine High School shootings. The film, supposedly touted as so controversial, it landed it's makers in jail, is loosely based on the events that took place in Colorado. Two young outsiders (in this case named Derwick and Derwin instead of Eric and Dylan), grow tired of being picked on and decide to kill their classmates and in the end, themselves. Yes, that's a gross oversimplification but this isn't the forum to rehash all of the outrageous reasons for school shootings, although that is probably one of the only uses for this film. But I'm getting ahead of myself.

Anyway, The movie was written and produced by WILLIAM HELLFIRE and JOEY SMACK. These two also play the lead character roles (as Derwick and Derwin) with HELLFIRE even doing the directing chores as well. The cast includes such forgettable people as LILLY TIGER (obviously not her real name), MICHAEL OVUM, and LIZ BATHORY as "GothGirl" (DEVILMAN's particular favorite character). The one "star" of the film (assuming you're into straight-to-DVD movies) is MISTY MUNDAE (the popular SEDUCTION CINEMA actress). She plays, ironically enough, "Bible Girl", but sadly, does not get naked anywhere in this flick.

DUCK!'s story? Simple enough. The film follows the events leading up to the infamous massacre, showing the lives of Derwick (JOEY SMACK) and Derwin (WILLIAM HELLFIRE), as well as the antics of their various two dimensional classmates. Our two "stars" spend their days ordering nuclear weapons from China via online retailing, reading hate websites, and putting up with their clueless, self involved parents. One of the more entertaining gimmicks in this film is that all of the parents in the town are played by the same two actors. I suppose this is WILLIAM HELLFIRE's commentary on how all parents are essentially the same in how they treat their kids. As for these in particular, Derwin's mom is ditzy, his dad is on prozac. Derwick's parents are equally worthless. They're drunks and abusive, and so on.

Anyway, as it goes, Derwin is brutally beaten by several said class members. He recovers from his ordeal, purchases guns with his pal Derwick (quite easily too I might add), and then BLAM! BLAM! And BLAM! BLAM! Oh, almost forgot, there is also a wacky subplot concerning the school's janitor who turns out to be not entirely from this world. Why? How? Hell, who really knows for sure with this script. You've got to see it to believe it. Trust me on this.

Yet no matter what impression you've already got about this movie, there are some good things to be had in DUCK!. WILLIAM HELLFIRE was surprisingly relaxed and natural as an actor. The role was probably not a real reach for him though, but he was enjoyable in a general cast of wooden planks. I said earlier I would get back to the gore, and here it is. The gunshot effects were simply great! The blood and explosions from the doomed student's bodies were all done very nicely. I personally thought MISTY MUNDAE's death scene in particular was very good. Derwin's inital beat down was also extremely brutal and eye pleasing. The only problem is that these scenes only make up 10 to 15 minutes of the movie. The rest of the flick is all stiff dialogue and often tedious build-up. The pay off just isn't worth the effort sometimes.

That being said, one cannot agrue enough that there's lots and lots of problems with this movie though. So here's my rant. First of all, the filmmakers would have you believe that their purpose was to make a satire on the way the media handled the rash of school schootings around Columbine. But guys, you missed something. If I put on a cop's hat and act goofy, and go around saying "Look at me, I'm a cop!", that's not satire. I think satire should have some subtlety and most of the time, it's absent in DUCK!. Secondly, if this whole affair was about all of the school shootings, why was the plot so note-for-note a copy of the original Columbine tragedy? Couldn't think of anything more original? And just because you're all from New Jersey, that doesn't give you the right to copy KEVIN SMITH's films with the whole "title cards between chapters" thing (ala CLERKS). And last (but certainly NOT least), what in the HELL was up with the insane UFO ending?! That just sucked! There's no other way to say it. And I'm not really spoiling this for anyone because no one will probably care about the ending anyway.

However, I think this movie might have been saved if a few things had been done differently. Mostly, I felt the film was just too damn long. I think it would have made an excellent short film, say some 20 to 30 minutes in length. That would have been plenty of time for the drama to unfold so we could get on with the shocks and impacts. As a full length feature, I feel it looses just about everything. I mean the audience is soooooo bored by the time we get to the actual shootings (something EVERYONE's been patiently waiting for), there is simply no emotional involvement anymore.

So, in closing, I admit, with the recent rash of new school shootings, DUCK! might serve one purpose - it may get people talking. If it makes you and your friends talk about why these sorts of things happen in our society, then the film's worth at least one viewing. I guess that would probably make the filmmakers very happy. But I'd suggest renting or borrowing the DVD from someone who already has it. I wouldn't recommend you spend your hard-earned cash on it.

- DevilMan



WHAT YOU SAID [VIEW]

Thule818 said
Umm I aint trying to say anything mean..but you suck.

I want to review the review.
It sounds like it sucked, and if it did suck, stop saying it sucked, but wouldnt suck if this and this and this suck, was taken out to make it stop sucking!
clear.... :devil:
No really...it sounds like shit...I believe there is a website with the line never star in a film you direct.....and it just sounds Yawnarific.
but you keep saying it sucked, but wouldnt suck.

heres the deal.
All the good stuff you said would be good if they did it, they didnt, so it sucked.
so the movie sucked.
I said it, and i cant stop thinking of howard the duck....damn it.
Scott W. Davis said
See? Told them I wasn't alone.

Like I said in another thread, I reviewed this film for CultCuts and absolutely hated it. What shocks me is how the film proposes to satire all these things... and it doesn't follow through with a single one of them. Instead, it just indulges in sophomoric humor. I can honestly say I didn't laugh at all in the scenes with Derrick and Derwin. Misty Mundae was the only thing worth recommending here. No, she does not show off the goods like she does in her Seduction Cinema vids, but she is a much better actress and has much better comedic instincts than anyone on the cast and crew (including Hellfire, whom she used to date). It was also a bit hypocritical. It laments how Derrick and Derwin are unfairly picked on because they are different. But check out the endless scenes in which they poke fun of the character they affectionately call Retard. Because he is in a wheelchair and mentally impaired, hence "different," he gets lots of really lame jokes at his expense. No, the film isn't offensive. It's too juvenile to be offensive.

Thing is when I criticized it at CultCuts, Hellfire (or more accurately his wife I believe) actually fired off letters to the editor in retaliation. Pretty pathetic. :rolleyes:
DevilMan said
QUOTE Umm I aint trying to say anything mean..but you suck.
Hopefully that's not directed to lovable old me because that does sound kinda mean. Anyway, I didn't write the review but my buddy did and we watched DUCK together before hw wrote it. And I agree with him all the way, it SUCKED!

QUOTE I want to review the review.
By all means, go ahead. Be warned though, the movie SUCKS!

QUOTE It sounds like it sucked, and if it did suck, stop saying it sucked, but wouldnt suck if this and this and this suck, was taken out to make it stop sucking! clear....
I've done my fair share of reviews so I know how hard it is to heap praise on something that has nothing going for it. Hence, it SUCKED!

QUOTE No really...it sounds like shit...
but you keep saying it sucked, but wouldnt suck.
heres the deal.
All the good stuff you said would be good if they did it, they didnt, so it sucked.
so the movie sucked.

I don't remember him actually using the word "SUCKS" in the review but thankfully you did get the overall gist of the whole movie review, which is... DUCK SUCKS!

QUOTE I said it, and i cant stop thinking of howard the duck....damn it.

A much better movie in my opinion.

-Steve
Thule818 said
no i agree the movie was shit, i just didnt like the review, should have been harder on them, and told it like the total piece of shit it was lol.
Scott W. Davis said
I thought he was plenty hard on the film and I welcome the fresh voice. The whole thing was fine by me. And yes, the film does indeed suck.
Thule818 said
grr...hey dont mind me, i am still hoping to get my arse posted here...sigh...i really want my name in lights, or at least internet...that will do nicely, something to remember me by when the zombie holocaust erupts and you are all fleeing to the mountains for you life.
hehehhee

Seen It? Tell Us What You Think




DIRECTOR

William Hellfire & Joey Smack

CAST

William Hellfire
Joey Smack
Misty Mundae
Michael Ovum
Liz Bathory
Lilly Tiger
Stephen Harris
Henry Krinkle
Kendall Ward
Marie Mazur
John Paul Fedele

RELEASE DATE

2000

REVIEWER

DevilMan

REVIEW DATE

5th June 2005 - 8:02PM

Links

DEAD GUYS CINEMA

Taglines

  • Before there was Michael Moore's BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE, before Gus Van Zant's ELEPHANT, there was DUCK!

Trivia

  • This film, the first made about the high school shooting phenomenon was considered so controversial, it landed the filmmakers in jail. This created a nationwide media circus on FOX, ABC, CBS, COURT TV, and ENTERTAINMENT TONIGHT.


the Last 10 Movie Reviews by

DevilMan