Horror Express, The Best in Horror Movie Reviews & News Contact Us News Our Forum Horror Movie Reviews Contact Us Horror Express Home Register  

Go Back   Horror Express Forum > Talk Horror > Horror Movies > Reviews

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-30-2003, 12:20 AM   #1
Scott W. Davis
Writer
 
Scott W. Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 1,269
Default

I certainly hope everyone involved in UNDERWORLD is prepared to attend conventions and answer vampire-related questions for the rest of their lives. This is one of those rare films that slips under the radar and delivers on almost everything, and what it doesn’t deliver is open to hours of debate. The film creates an entire universe to play around with, and no it's not the same universe as White Wolf's, even if there are similarities.



The first thing we see is Selene (Kate Beckinsale - PEARL HARBOR, SERENDIPITY) perched on a rooftop, letting the rain fall down on her. The wind causes her cape to billow and we get a few attention-getting glimpses of a perfectly sculpted backside through her black latex outfit. Selene tells us through narration that a thousand year war between vampires and Lycans (short for lycanthropes, a.k.a. werewolves) is almost at an end. The Lycans have been driven to the point of extinction now that their leader has been reportedly dispatched. Still, being a Death Dealer, the warrior cast of the vampires, Selene is always at the ready.



Before a word of dialogue has been uttered, a shootout occurs that raises Selene's suspicions. She finds out that the remaining Lycans are taking an interest in Michael Corvin (Scott Speedman - DUETS, the horrendous DARK BLUE), and it's not just because his name suggests he could be the next Crow. She tracks down Michael and discovers that the Lycans may not be as dead as previously thought.



The trick about a film like this is that there is so much going on, you have to know when to stop blabbering (hard for me, I know). You don't want to give away too much. Hence, I've left out tons of scintillating details from the entire body of this review. Suffice to say there are many side-stories that almost seem like mini-movies in themselves. There is Selene's boss, aptly named Kraven (Shane Brolly). He's what you get were you to cross Morrissey with a Young Republican, a bureaucratic slime who is violently fixated on Selene. Meanwhile, Erika (Sophia Myles - NICHOLAS NICKELBY, THUNDERBIRDS) is fixated on Kraven, a romantic triangle largely glossed-over in the film.



If anyone is expecting the vampires and werewolves to be chowing down on Londoners left and right, don't count on it. Maybe they could get away with that sort of behavior in the 19th century, but it's a new world now. It's a realistic touch that in the Information Age, neither race would survive long if they treated the English countryside as a moving buffet. Instead, the vamps survive on various plasma banks. As for the werewolves, well we are never sure. I imagine that there would be a shortage of sewer rats, the local butcher is doing killer business and if your kitty runs away, he's probably tender vittles by night's end. Both races also use guns. The vamps deal out silver bullets via automatic fire. What is new to the game is the use of lethal force in Lycan weaponry - the bullets now harness ultraviolet radiation of some sort. The action scenes are hence equal parts Hammer, Hong Kong actioner and James Cameron.



UNDERWORLD is a big test of some unproven talent. Len Wiseman finds himself in charge of a big feature film for the first time. His previous experience included music videos and serving as assistant on the Roland Emmerich films STARGATE and INDEPENDENCE DAY. Ditto screenwriter Danny McBride, a stuntman/actor turned screenwriter (He turns up on screen as one of the creatures). McBride has taken a very complex and ambitious story and done an amazing job condensing it into just over two hours. In fact, there is so much information being brought forth, it oddly feels like not much is going on in the middle of the film. In fact, it's just the opposite. It's a constant bombardment that almost reaches information overload. I realized only days after the screening that my issue is not with the length of the film but with how well the information is translated in the time allotted. This would be a daunting task for any screenwriter and McBride deserves credit for giving it the college try. In some professional reviews of this film, including a certain prominent figure from Chicago, the critics have demonstrated a shocking lack of story comprehension, and I'm sure they'll agree a lack of interest. That is hardly an excuse. There is a lot to keep track of and I won't play the high ground by pretending I got everything. It may take a while longer for that to happen. As it is, UNDERWORLD is structured like a film where you can watch it again and again to pick out things you missed the first time around. It should also improve on repeat viewings. I may like it now, but I expect I may love it by this time next year.



And I do like it. Wiseman must have paid awfully close attention on those sets, because he has shown a true mastery of the camera. There are sequences where every shot seems to match up perfectly. One climactic image comes to mind, as one character manages to glide from the upper right hand side of the screen to the lower left corner with perfect grace. He takes advantage of the Widescreen (2.35:1) aspect ratio and it's wonderful to see. I personally feel the marketing of Fullscreen DVDs is counterproductive. If they start selling a pan & scan UNDERWORLD, it will be downright criminal.



Although the pics here appear to be rather colorful, the film has been treated in post-production to a saturation process that bathes everything in grays and cool blues ( for the finalized pics). This saturation certainly makes the film look more futuristic, which suits the alternate universe it occupies. Also, it adds urgency to the events, since many times people seem drenched in a cold sweat. However, the overall effect was not fully successful. For some reason, it always feels as though we are missing something. And while the saturation makes the film look more futuristic, I wonder if the original color scheme wouldn't have been more pleasing to the eye. As it stands, it feels as though we are looking at the film through the veil of a fever dream, just trying to grasp everything. This is aided by the boominf soundtrack (only part of which is reflected in the soundtrack CD ), which combines claps of thunder with loud orchestrated musical crescendos.



The production design is excellent. The art direction wonderfully creates a future-goth world where the streets are washed in torrential downpours and daylight is nowhere to be seen. The special effects are incredible, with some impressive non-intrusive CGI as well as exquisite latex effects and action set-pieces.



At a modest 23 million dollars, UNDERWORLD looks like it cost three times as much. THE RUNDOWN, starring The Rock, cost 85 million dollars and looks like a TV movie in comparison. It's a reminder that big money does not equal big movies, but big imagination does.



The actors do an admirable job here. Michael Sheen (no relation to Martin) is excellent as the head of the Lycan clan. His piercing eyes suggest an early Viggo Mortensen with just a touch of mania. His character is expanded upon wonderfully, and we empathize with him, due to a great performance. Bill Nighy is fantastic as a vampire lord. The supporting cast is solid across the board. U.K. readers will be happy to know that the film is set in London and no effort has been made to Americanize the surroundings. This extends to the talented European cast. Of all the performances, only Scott Speedman (the sole yank of the bunch) is lacking and that doesn't seem to be his fault. Speedman does his best with what he's given and a twist towards the end is amazing both on his part and the filmmakers’. However, he is thrust into this strange world so quickly, we never really get a chance to know him.



But as many reviewers have already said, the real star of the show is Kate Beckinsale. Her performance is nothing short of a revelation. I was burned by PEARL HARBOR when I paid my hard-earned cash to see it in the theatre. I hated the film and I remember saying some pretty cruel things about Beckinsale's performance. The phrase "mannequin acting out Danielle Steel-level romanticism" comes to mind. Well, no matter what her sins where there and in the schmaltzy SERENDIPITY from the same year, she has put that all behind her. She's amazing here, every bit the lone crusader. She comes across as a steely-eyed heroine, dedicated to one cause - some would say, to a fault. She is so assured and perfect in this part that no man or woman has personified a hero this badass in some time.



Some of the promotions have presented this as a ROMEO AND JULIET with vampires and werewolves, a pitch that has gotten Nancy A. Collins' knickers in a twist. To me, the film felt closer to KING LEAR than anything else from the Bard. The werewolves want the throne, Kraven wants the throne, but it is the good and virtuous Selene who has no ideas of conquest, that does what's right and is rewarded with the shunning from her family. It's a bit of a stretch, I know.



But if I fail to see the Shakespearean connection they tried to put forth, it's because I don't see the love story. For a moment, I thought it was just an advertising ploy, but interviews with Wiseman and Beckinsale have also brought up the R&J idea. I sure thought I paid to see the same movie, yet I did not see Selene and Michael fall in love. Hell, they don't have time. There is one moment that suggests attraction, but it could easily be read as something else. I never got the idea of "two starcross'd lovers" from this film. Instead, I interpreted the relationship as Selene's protection of an unwilling participant who could be the key to finding the truth behind a thousand years war. Frankly, I like my interpretation better, but that doesn't make it the intended message.



Still, despite its flaws, UNDERWORLD is a thoroughly enjoyable film. It features tons of beautiful art direction, fantastic scenarios and a wonderful story, all accompanied by an okay script. The filmmakers were wise to create a world and mythology (complete with Celtic-inspired symbols) that can be continually be built on. It's a good thing the sequel and prequel have both been cleared, because anything less would be a severe disappointment. You can safely expect loads of fiction, both fan-generated on the internet and professional paperbacks in the bookstores (paging Christopher Golden...). UNDERWORLD is not a perfect film, but it is very interesting, and one I plan to revisit more than once.



No matter what the final box office tally is, or what the critical response, UNDERWORLD's strengths and weaknesses will be debated for years to come. So, clear your schedule guys. You're going to have a lot of anxious fans to answer to.



--------



[I 90h underworld I]Want a second opinion? Then, read the UNDERWORLD review by our very own !



--------



Comment on this review in our !



--------



Don't ever said we never gave you anything. Enjoy these UNDERWORLD wallpapers, courtesy of Sony's !



[I 160w selene_1024x768 I][I 160w erika_1024x768 I][I 160w kahn_1024x768 I]

[I 160w lucian_1024x768 I][I 160w michael_1024x768 I][I 160w raze_1024x768 I]

[I 160w viktor_1024x768 I]
__________________
----------------------
Scott W. Davis

Quote:
I like it. It's a statement.
- (Linnea Quigley, Return of the Living Dead)
Scott W. Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2003, 09:47 PM   #2
DevilMan
Writer
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Monster Island, somewhere in the South Pacific
Posts: 2,198
Default

Well, the wait won't be too much longer for the home video enthusiast. This breaking news just in from DVDANSWERS...

Quote:
Arriving in January will be the Blade look alike Underworld starring Kate Beckinsale and Scott Speedman. The official announcement from Columbia has yet to arrive but already we have a look at the artwork and a few of the disc specs thanks to reader Bill Davidson. The disc itself will be available to own in seperate widescreen and fullscreen releases from the 6th January next year. The retail price for each of these is set at around $28.95. Both widescreen and fullscreen releases will carry director and writer commentaries, four featurettes, a music video, storyboards and more.


-Steve
__________________
That was Zen. This is Tao.
DevilMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2005, 07:52 AM   #3
Thule818
Speaking Part
 
Thule818's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 227
Default

Hey jsut curious what ever happened to the law suit by White wolf against Underworld?
I liked both game and movie, and it aint fair for them to steal shit and not pay out.
any ideas as to the outcome?
__________________
Quote:
Howdy Folks! You like blood? Violence? Freaks of nature? Well then, come on down to Captain Spaulding's Museum of Monsters and Mad-Men. See the Alligator Boy, ride my famous Murder Ride. Most of all, don't forget to take home some of my tasty fried chicken! Ha ha! It just tastes so damn good!
Thule818 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2005, 11:38 PM   #4
feral cat
Speaking Part
 
feral cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 87
Send a message via Yahoo to feral cat
Default

... thought this movie was generic sub matrix popcorn ... just people shooting at each other so zero reason for them to be vampires and Lycans, not terrible, but far from great.
__________________


ispitonyourmovie.com | latefilm.com
feral cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2005, 04:12 AM   #5
42nd Street Freak
Writer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 869
Default

I like it. It had a great look and some excellent set-pieces, and the DC takes it's time to actually tell a story. Some very good plot twists as well.
My main beef is that the Vamps are so damn weak (and not Vampyric enough!!) and for supposed assassins they are also shit shots!!
Far more hand to hand (ala "Buffy" or "Angel") fights between the VAmps and the Werewolves would have been better.
__________________

42nd Street Freak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2005, 05:31 PM   #6
Raven
Moderator
 
Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Somersham, Cambridgeshire, UK
Posts: 2,783
Send a message via AIM to Raven Send a message via MSN to Raven Send a message via Yahoo to Raven
Default

I wounder if this was called Vampires Vs Werewolves would it suddenly be hated? Anyway i thought this film was great, pure entertainment from start to finish.
__________________
"Lay down here and we'll do some tests. If Fry is out there then Leela's brain could be acting as a five-pound Ouija board."

"Is this some sort of brain scanner?"

"Some sort, yes. In France it's called a guillotine."

"Professor! Can't you examine my brain without removing it?"

"Yes, easily."
Raven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2005, 06:44 PM   #7
DevilMan
Writer
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Monster Island, somewhere in the South Pacific
Posts: 2,198
Default

What else is there to mention about UNDERWORLD other than it features KATE BECKINSALE in a form-fitting black leather catsuit... shooting guns!

-Steve
__________________
That was Zen. This is Tao.
DevilMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
REVIEW - The Texas Chainsaw Massacre [2003] Scott W. Davis Reviews 19 02-21-2010 09:58 PM
REVIEW - Freddy Vs. Jason [2003] Scott W. Davis Reviews 12 07-20-2008 04:51 AM
REVIEW - Mimic 3: Sentinel [2003] Scott Norton Reviews 0 10-31-2007 01:27 PM
REVIEW - Underworld [2003] DevilMan Reviews 6 03-14-2004 09:07 AM
REVIEW - The Return of the King [2003] Unknown Reviews 7 03-05-2004 12:53 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.