PDA

View Full Version : REVIEW - Wendigo [2002]


Scott W. Davis
12-18-2002, 03:43 AM
Larry Fessenden strives to infuse extremely dramatic stories with a

sense of supernatural mystery, showing the magic around us in a cruel

and mundane world. At least, that seems to be what he aims for and in

a select few spots, he succeeds. Most of the time, however, his films

play like dramas that turn into horror films because they don't know

where else to go.



It was the same with Fessenden's earlier films, HABIT and NO TELLING.

There's definitely an audience for this and he seems to be developing

a cult following, just not by me. No, to me his films seem like

schizophrenic efforts with tons of padding thrown in, just to be sure.



A yuppie family is out to spend a weekend in the Catskills, no

television, no jobs, just simple family bonding ( And people wonder

why my generation chose to watch TV ). At least that's the plan for

the first two minutes of the film, before their car smacks head on

into a deer. It's a wonder that no one is seriously hurt, and the

front of the car is badly mangled, but everyone is okay, except for

the car getting stuck in a ditch.



Along come some hunters who were tracking the deer, allegedly to help

out. Still, most of them seem to do nothing and one of them, a creep

named Otis ( John Speredakos - SCHOOL TIES ) seems to be passive

aggressive enough to get under the family's skin.



Actually, I personally thought that while Otis may have been immature

and a blowhard, the family was pretty ungrateful as well. They never

seemed to thank the hunters for coming along and staying with them.

Still, this first act does feel authentic. After the accident, nothing

major happens, just tiny annoyances that make a typically bad day

worse.



Once they get to the cabin, the family tries to adjust. The main focus

is on their little boy, Miles ( Eric Per Sullivan - MALCOLM IN THE

MIDDLE ), who we suspect may have some emotional problems although it

is never made perfectly clear. His parents have a good marriage, but

seem worried about the father's ability to communicate with his son.

Again, not made very clear but it's there.



Somewhere along the way, Miles encounters an American Indian who tells

him the legend of the Wendigo, an all-powerful spirit of the forest.



I would love to go into more detail from here, but for the most part,

this is the whole movie. WENDIGO is an extremely slow-moving film

which focuses mainly on three very dull people who spend a lot of time

talking. And talking, and talking, and talking.... In fact, we're a

full hour into the film before anything substantial happens. For much

of the running time, I kept asking myself, "Is there a film in here

somewhere?"



The adult leads, Patricia Clarkson ( FAR FROM HEAVEN, THE GREEN MILE )

and Jake Weber ( AMERICAN GOTHIC, U-571 ), should be commended. They

have to carry this film most of the way and they do an outstanding

job. It means a lot that they bring enough genuine emotion to their

parts to keep me from giving up on the film altogether.



The first hour of the film is essentially the wind-up for the final

act. It supplies the drama that is referenced later on in the most

emotional scenes. It's not that I didn't get Fessenden's vision. I

just didn't care. The film just seems to ramble along and then with

one plot twist, suddenly asks you to care about how everything turns

out. To that I say, "What have you done for me lately?"



Fessenden also makes one fatal flaw. By showing most of the film's

events through Miles' eyes, he leaves us open to a world of

imagination and wonder. For most of the film, everything can be taken

either as genuine or a trick of the imagination. The events of the

film would be the type an adult Miles would look back on, wondering if

it was real or not. But although possibly unintentional, Fessenden

does spell things out more than he should in the end, giving us a

pretty definite answer over which is which.



Things get almost melodramatic towards the end. It's the kind of chain

reaction of events that reminded me of THE REFLECTING SKIN.

Thankfully, WENDIGO has none of SKIN's lame dialogue, paper-thin

characters or overtly artsy fartsy pretensions.







Which is why, if you're looking for a slow, character-driven indie

flick, it may be necessary to give WENDIGO the benefit of the doubt. I

personally don't care for Fessenden's work, but he does seem to take

great care with the material. Although I react negatively to WENDIGO,

it is nowhere near as bad as several other pseudo-horror films I could

mention. Still, keep in mind that horror is never foremost on

Fessenden's mind and it can be a supreme dissapointment for anyone

looking for more than a family trying to resolve their "issues."



You are not getting a horror movie. You are not getting a drama. You

are getting a drama that turns to horror because it runs out of

options. No doubt, on the highest levels of art house trendiness, but

for those who see through such things, it's a colossal waste of our

time. Each person is going to react differently to Fessenden and it's

best to know what you're getting into.



I knew what I was getting into and shame on me for not listening. This

film will no doubt develop an audience of latte-drinking followers. It

was my misfortune that I was in more of a black coffee mood when

WENDIGO rolled.





- Scott W. Davis

jim
12-20-2002, 07:36 AM
Brilliant - latte drinkers - that had me in stitches man...

Guest
12-26-2002, 09:44 AM
:o
Slow-moving, not particularly original or suspenseful. I thought it was a fine, moody effort nonetheless. I think the urban vs. threatening, resentful redneck thing has been overdone, but I hated the rednecks right away.

MystMoonstruck
02-19-2010, 09:46 PM
I'm a Larry Fessenden fan. I'm not sure which movie it was that finally truly won me over, making me take note of him. I think I registered his name connected to this film, but it took a few more works to have me watching for him.

"Wendigo" is one I've watched a number of times. It's slow-moving but does have that good segment of the creature appearing. However, my main gripe is this: Why the explicit scene? It simply doesn't belong in the film, and I can't see that it's one of those "Time for a gratuitous sex scene!" instances as in the Grade-B slasher films. Maybe I'm a bit of a prude, but it just seemed completely unnecessary.

I like the atmosphere of the film and its wintry setting, which Fessenden returned to for "The Last Winter" (2006). I'm drawn to snowbound films: "Wind Chill", "Ghost Story", "Smilla's Sense of Snow", "The Thing" (both versions), etc.

whataboutbilly
02-21-2010, 07:47 AM
Great movie but definitely slow moving which hampers an otherwise excellent movie.