PDA

View Full Version : The Return of the Living Dead


Juan Rayo
08-16-2005, 09:22 PM
Sometimes I wonder about Romero’s Zombies. Sure, I mean, part of the reason they always win out is because WE humans are stupid and turn against ourselves, paving the way for the slow, lumbering creatures to feast on human entrails. “But still”, I think to myself “they are SO slow… why; we could walk by them if we wanted”. Is there no place in the world that resisted them? No army? No nation?. Thinking about that (yeah, I AM a dork), I got my hands into “The Return of the living dead” and those questions became moot as soon as I took a look at THESE zombies. They may not be as classy as Romero’s, but you can easily picture them overrunning the world.

I had never seen this movie, and have not seen any of it’s sequels. Well, I saw it as a kid in someone’s betamax, but I could barely remember anything about it, except that it had grossed me out a bit. So I decided to give it another go now that I have a somewhat better “horror” education. When it ended, all I could think was “man I should have done that SOONER”. The movie is great.

It came in 1985, smack in the middle of a “morals regression” spearheaded in the political front by Reagan and Tatcher, and also in the apogee of pop’s culture most mediocre time (Jackson, CindyLauper, Culture Club, sheesh) and it works against both, breaking ranks with the “kids have sex and die only virgin survives” motive of the slasher films and siding with the metal tunes that, back there, seemed rebellious and full of energy.

At the same time, while very funny (and not in the “repeat lame jokes ad eternum” way of some latter horror movies) and with a VERY generous amount of nudity, the movie manages to go from comedy horror to sober, almost sad at the very end, and it works great. It pays a very obvious tribute to the Romero films (and as well it should), but then goes completely in it’s own way.

Director Dan O’Bannon should be very well know to horror fans. The man has been involved in a lot of projects dearly appreciated in the genre. He has writing credits for “Darkstar”(1974) alongside John Carpenter, co-writing the story for “Alien” (1979), Story for the"Soft Landing" and "B-17" segments in the great Heavy Metal (1981), some “Blue Thunder” stuff from 1983 to 1984 (including creating the TV series), until finally directing The Return of the Living Dead in 1985. Since then, he wrote the screenplay for the great, Tobe Hopper directed Lifeforce (1985), writing credits for Aliens (1986), Total Recall (1990), Alien 3 (1993), Screamers (1995), Bleeders (1997), Alien Resurrection (1997) and the only real dud I can see him in, AvP in 2004.

“The return of the Living Dead” starts with a caption warning us that everything in the movie is based on “real events, all names and company names mentioned are real”. I knew from there I would like this. It continues with a rather humorous tone, and takes it’s time to start as nearly 8 minutes go by until the opening credits start to roll. The story goes like this: a couple of employees at a medical supply warehouse –Frank (James Karen) and Freddy (Thom Mathews) - “accidentally” release a deadly gas (“3,4,5 trioxin”, originally developed to spray marihuana fields!) that makes the dead come back… see, the good old government had been keeping the zombies from “Night of the Living dead” (yeah! How about that for a nod!) in some kind of canister. As Burt explains, they can never leak, being as they are design and built by the US Army Engineer corps. Of course, the canisters start leaking and the great Kentucky zombie derby begins.

To solve the problem, they call their boss (of course!) Brilliantly played by Glu Gulager, and together they decided to take the recently reawakened corpse to a nearby funeral home, where Ernie Kaltenbrunner (Don Kalfa) makes for a magnificent soft spoken, gun totting portrayal of an embalmer.

In the meantime, Freddy’s girlfriend, all around nice girl Tina (Beverly Randolph) sporting a dress straight out the “Thriller” video decides to go looking for her boyfriend, taking along her somewhat strange choice of friends: ultra punk “Suicide” (Mark Venturini), Trash (Linnea Quigley), Spider (Miguel Nuñes), Chuck (John Philbin), Cuz (Brian Peck) and Casey (Jewel Shepard). As the different players converge on the mortuary/cemetery setting, the stage is set for the gore to begin. And that it does.

While it turns rather quickly into a “survivors trapped and surrounded by Zombies” plot we have seen done a lot, it somehow seems original. The acting greatly helps, as Freddy and Frank have great chemistry together, and when they are, huh, “removed” from the spotlight, their place is taken by Burt and Ernie, keeping the dialogue flowing easily, funny and believable. One can truly believe these characters are real. That’s not to say everything works, of course. When the movie ended, I could not fathom what reason did Chuck and Casey have in the movie, other than stretching the running time and provide some funny lines.

With the cemetery (who named it “Resurrection” anyways? That’s just asking for trouble) and Mortuary (with the “Wee chapel of the dawn”) as settings, the movie moves fast and perfectly paced.

Mr. O’Bannon direction is very capable, showing an eye not only for camp (the split dog!) and gore, but also for actors, making the most out of the good people he had to work with in this one. The humour is nicely done, and it respects the characters, something that I really enjoyed. The paramedics, for example, are no joke, they are clearly professionals who know what they are doing and act believably (fat lot of good it does them of course). There are also little nuances to the characters that work very well. Notice Frank’s demeanour as he prepares to call his boss, or Ernie’s action as zombie-Freddy is about to burst thru the trap door.

Also, it’s no wonder Mathilda May spends most of her time naked in “Lifeforce”, since O’Bannon was involved with it. To see what I mean, just look at what he had Linnea Quigley doing, and I must say, she carried it on PERFECTLY. “Trash” is a tramp, she is a slut, and she shines on it. Kudos to Mss. Quigley for knowing how to play the minutiae of a character, I mean, notice the scene in front of the cemetery when she gets down of the car and you’ll KNOW what I mean.

The movie can be separated in two parts. It starts as comedy, and some 45 minutes into the story things get really gory, really fast. Sadly, they a get a bit silly too, since talking zombies do not normally have great lines besides the already muttered “brains”. The second part is also where the soundtrack most diverges from the movie, I’m sorry, but I just don’t have a sweet ear for hair metal and it really was a minus for me.

As for the special effects, Mr. Bill Munns did a terrific job. While there aren’t really a LOT of gore scenes, they are very well done. The zombies themselves are strong, fast, and to make it worse, really smart. Plus, there’s a LOT of them. Once you see them charging the police barricades, you get a feeling of how really, utterly unstoppable they are, and that’s a scary thought.

Sadly, the 80’s bad rock that permeates the scores is the one thing that detracts from the movie, and it really took me out of the flow of things. Admittedly, I just hate most of the 80’s hair rock, so it could be just me.

I have to comment on the script, as is very smartly written, I mean, the movie is a quote fest and I had a hard time deciding which ones to use in the “five things” section below. Some of the lines are guaranteed to make you chuckle and, of course, the “Brains” thing is already the stuff of legends.

Finally, the movie spawned a series of sequels (at least two that I am aware of) that I haven’t seen, but would certainly like to, even with Mr. O’Bannon’s absence, if they can manage to be half as funny and gory as this one I would certainly enjoy them.

The Taglines perfectly capture the spirit of this movie: “They're back...They're Hungry...And they're NOT vegetarian” , “They're Back From The Grave and Ready To Party!”, “I love you - I want to eat your brains”.

All in all, this is a great, fun movie and one that deserves a place into any zombie bigot / horror fan DVD collection.

Five things about this movie:

. 17:15 The zombie dog!!
. 18:06 The zombie butterflies! (I shit you not)
. 20:00 Trash does her thing, God bless her.
. 44:36 “Brains!” the stuff of legend is born.
. 57:47 Zombie on the ambulance radio:
“Come in, dispatch..send..more..paramedics” (and later) “Send more cops…”.

Rad!

Red_Rapids
08-17-2005, 06:16 AM
I agree with you, I love this movie. You have to see RETURN OF THE LIVING DEAD 2. That one's even funnier. The 3rd one wasn't bad either.

Raven
08-17-2005, 07:29 AM
part 3 was pretty good, it took a more serious tone than the first two films, but avoid part 2, it is awful

Red_Rapids
08-17-2005, 11:38 AM
C'mon Raven, that one was funny.

Juan Rayo
08-17-2005, 12:07 PM
Well, I am looking to get both #2 and #3 as "The return..." left me with enough interest to check out the whole series. However, I have always been distrustfull of sequels. Only one way to find out, of course.

Raven
08-17-2005, 12:23 PM
part 2 had some funny moments, like the severed hand giving the car the finger, that was funny. But overall it is a terrible film though to be fair it has been awhile since i saw it. Part 3 i am a very big fan of, it stopped with the jokes and went with a serious story.

I want to see parts 4 & 5

42nd Street Freak
08-17-2005, 01:03 PM
Good work!

I read the novel first which played the entire thing seriously. As such i did not like the film on first viewing. Later on it gre on me and now it's a bonafide favourite of the genre.

Just the right mix of homage, parody, original humour and the deadly serious.
Great use of music as well.


#2 was a turkey. Truly dire slop.

#3 was pretty good (a few silly FX aside) and played the idea surprisingly seriously as well.

Juan Rayo
08-17-2005, 01:14 PM
Originally posted by 42nd Street Freak@Aug 17 2005, 06:03 PM
Good work!
I read the novel first which played the entire thing seriously. As such i did not like the film on first viewing. Later on it gre on me and now it's a bonafide favourite of the genre.

Just the right mix of homage, parody, original humour and the deadly serious.
Great use of music as well.
Quoted post



Thanks! The music I really didn't much care for, specially in the "second part of the movie".

There was a novel? I saw nothing about it in the IMDB, gonna have to look for it as well! thanks for the info.

42nd Street Freak
08-17-2005, 01:23 PM
Originally posted by Juan Rayo@Aug 17 2005, 07:14 PM
Thanks! The music I really didn't much care for, specially in the "second part of the movie".

There was a novel? I saw nothing about it in the IMDB, gonna have to look for it as well! thanks for the info.
Quoted post


Yeah...written by John Russo. 1985

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0751652/#writer

Scott W. Davis
08-17-2005, 03:49 PM
Well, you know I dig the movie as I quote the lovely Linnea Quigley in my sig. Yes, there was a novel which I have not read, which treats things as John Russo originally meant them to be treated... 100% serious. Here's the problem - John Russo is a comically untalented douchebag. Really, he has parlayed his NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD involvement into nearly forty years of pure ass. Don't believe me? Check out his films. - SATAN CLAWS, CHILDREN OF THE LIVING DEAD, DARK CRAVING and of course the NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD: 30TH ANNIVERSARY SPECIAL EDITION in which he added new scenes to the film, scenes which everyone pretty much dismisses as crap. He's so bad that even my love of the ubiquitous Debbie Rochon (who appears in a few of his productions) can't force me to watch him any more.

Oh, and ROTLD2 was horrible, but Part 3 by director Brian Yuzna was surprisingly great.

DevilMan
08-18-2005, 07:52 PM
JUAN, great review there.

*Hint Hint, SCOTT*

As with your earlier ALIEN LOCKDOWN comments, I loved the "5 Things" listing you put at the end. That's a trademark now!

And for what it's worth, I agree with the others that ROTLD 2 is simply an awful terrible mess. Don't waste your time with it. Part 3, on the other hand, it's a "guilty pleasure" for fanboys of the main character (and you all know who you are).

-Steve

Juan Rayo
08-18-2005, 09:13 PM
Originally posted by DevilMan@Aug 19 2005, 12:52 AM
JUAN, great review there.
As with your earlier ALIEN LOCKDOWN comments, I loved the "5 Things" listing you put at the end. That's a trademark now!
-Steve
Quoted post


Thanks Mr. Devilman, high praise indeed. As with the "5 things", it's not something original, I saw years ago a place where some guy listed things he particulary liked about the movies he reviewed (just can't remember where). It was similar.

I got ROTLD 2 and 3 today, probably will see them during the night. I actually started number 2 and some minutes into it went to sleep, so you can guess what I am already thinking about it.

Raven
08-19-2005, 07:49 AM
And for what it's worth, I agree with the others that ROTLD 2 is simply an awful terrible mess. Don't waste your time with it. Part 3, on the other hand, it's a "guilty pleasure" for fanboys of the main character (and you all know who you are).


:shifty: :whistling: :lmao:

Supercool
08-19-2005, 03:03 PM
Originally posted by Juan Rayo+Aug 19 2005, 03:13 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Juan Rayo @ Aug 19 2005, 03:13 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-DevilMan@Aug 19 2005, 12:52 AM
JUAN, great review there.
As with your earlier ALIEN LOCKDOWN comments, I loved the "5 Things" listing you put at the end. That's a trademark now!
-Steve
Quoted post


Thanks Mr. Devilman, high praise indeed. As with the "5 things", it's not something original, I saw years ago a place where some guy listed things he particulary liked about the movies he reviewed (just can't remember where). It was similar.

I got ROTLD 2 and 3 today, probably will see them during the night. I actually started number 2 and some minutes into it went to sleep, so you can guess what I am already thinking about it.
Quoted post
[/b][/quote]

similar to the badmovies.org system. good review though.

Juan Rayo
08-19-2005, 03:18 PM
Originally posted by Supercool@Aug 19 2005, 08:03 PM
similar to the badmovies.org system. good review though.
Quoted post


Yeah, that's why I mentioned it wasn't original, lest I be taken for a plagiarizer (dunno how to spell it, but you get it). Thanks Mr. Supercool, that's exactly it. Too bad, tough, I like finding bits of things about movies and highlighting them. Just gonna have to keep on trying and developing a personal style and hopefully be able to write good reviews in the future.

Juan Rayo
08-19-2005, 03:22 PM
Well, I just finished watching number two. My first, gut reaction? I hated it :angry: . I'll be sure to post some thoughts on it later on. Now, it's on to ROTLD number 3!

Raven
08-26-2005, 10:48 AM
you should like ROTLD 3, its alot more serious and is a huge improvement from the terrible ROTLD 2

Juan Rayo
08-28-2005, 01:34 PM
Agree on both things, Mr. Raven... man, number two is such a suckfest that it took the ¨write a review" air out of me... still... it IS tempting to take it apart, yes? So I´ll post something about it as soon as I get my DAMN cable connection back and can stop having to go to cyber cafes to check out HE.

Trioxin245
04-05-2006, 04:37 PM
I hade almost gave up hope finding a ROTLD thread.

In an overall excellence, I'd say that ROTLD surpasses even Romero's masterpiece, Dawn Of The Dead. Maybe it's like comparing apples and oranges (satire does not equate to spoof), but they're both zombie flicks, and ROTLD is the best goddamned zombie flick I'll might have ever seen. The whole film just screams 80's style, wich just turns up the atmosphere in the film into the classic it has become. The 80's punk beats of the soundtrack is by far excellent, and seize to keep me attached throughout the entire film. The golden actors James Karen and Thom Matthews brings out most of the comical moments through their terrific and hilarious performance(in both ROTLD & ROTLD II) You can't get enough of them. The black humor with an sense of slapstick, and yet serious level. Makes The Return of the Living Dead one of the most unique and quite orignal Zombie film out there, as it introduce a new set of elements for the Zombie genre, The first Zombie film ever featuring running ones, The hunger for Brains and damn a heck of alot other things to spread an eager of delight.

I would say ROTLD is quite possibly the most cult classic and influential Zombie flick ever, right up there with Dawn of the Dead.

For ROTLD II, have an love/hate relationship with it. I hate its wasted potenial thought, but still one of those more sequels to outlives themself in entertaiment. I just really gives it a watch for more brains and good ol' performance by my favourites Thom Mathews and James Karen, its a pity Clu Gulager(Burt Wilson) never go the act of Doc Mandel. Clu was infact interested in that part. As for ROTLD III? Its decent for most of it, the love story was strong yet abit overexaggerated. The mayor problem I have with Part III, is its continuty problem, no 'BRAINS' lines, not enough brain eating, and too much flesheating(wich btw makes no sense) But the biggest thing I simply couldn't stand was the Tarmans, nice to see plenty of them, but why in hell did they have hair?? And couldn't they have sticken to more original look for them. Althought I must admit, the Spanish spin cord zombie is priceless funny.

And for ROTLD 4. Now, For being an die hard fan of the original ROTLD, I must say this is one of the biggest disappointments, I have ever experienced. Zombies fightning? Zombies walking? Zombies eating flesh? Zombies dying by an blow in the head? And even by bullet wounds in their body?? This whole movie is generaly a complete discrase to the legendary ROTLD and indestructible Zombies that Dan O'Bannon created. Was the writer watching Resident Evil while he wrote this? It gets one brain from me.

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y37/Nightmareman95/brain1.gif

I haven't seen ROTLD 5, and I doubt I'm planning to.

Raven
04-05-2006, 04:50 PM
And for ROTLD 4. Now, For being an die hard fan of the original ROTLD, I must say this is one of the biggest disappointments, I have ever experienced. Zombies fightning? Zombies walking? Zombies eating flesh? Zombies dying by an blow in the head? And even by bullet wounds in their body?? This whole movie is generaly a complete discrase to the legendary ROTLD and indestructible Zombies that Dan O'Bannon created. Was the writer watching Resident Evil while he wrote this? It gets one brain from me.

I agree with you, even though im an all time hater of running zombies. ROTLD pulled it off because it wasn't a serious zombie film. It was a horror comedy. ROTLD 3 had the slower zombies BUT it was a serious zombie flick. The series has really lost sight of itself and it is a shame to a series that started so brilliantly well go down hill this fast

SUPREME
04-05-2006, 05:08 PM
Along with SOCIETY and NECRONOMICON, ROTLD 3 is one of Brian Yuzna's best films, and much more than a showcase for Steve Johnson's marvellous rubbery gore effects.

The banter between the three main characters in the morgue in the original is often achingly funny, especially when things heat up and one guy starts running around trying to look serious with one of his trouser legs ripped off.