PDA

View Full Version : REVIEW - The Grudge [2004]


Scott W. Davis
11-09-2004, 09:28 PM
It is now early November and so far this year, I have seen nearly four hundred films. Some have been first time viewings, some have been new experiences. But by far the scariest film I've seen so far this year is 2003's JU-ON: THE GRUDGE. The only reason I have not sung this films praises in a long, rambling review was that two other Horror Express writers, Tom Foster and Devilman, beat me to the punch. JU-ON was one of the first films I saw purely on the recommendation of our writers and I was blown away. For my money, it will become a modern horror classic.



In an age where people are wondering when the Asian horror boom will finally run out of steam, Takashi Shimizu proved there was still plenty of juice left in the movement. He has explored the same premise several times over. JU-ON started out in the form of a couple V-movies before making a blockbuster switch to the big screen. Shimizu did a sequel to that film which hasn't met with the same success, but still gets some positive notes. Switch to America, where Sam Raimi was riding high from his SPIDER-MAN success. Using his influence, he opened Ghost House Productions, a company solely designed to give interesting low-budget horror filmmakers a shot in a larger arena. When the idea of remaking JU-ON came about, who better to handle it than the man who engineered its success overseas?



THE GRUDGE is the American remake of JU-ON. It will be difficult to review this film without comparing it to another recent remake THE RING. It will be impossible to review it without comparing it to the original. So, just to prepare you now, you'll be reading a lot of comparisons here.



The basic premise of THE GRUDGE is one that has been repeated throughout Japan's history. It stems from the idea that negative energy is a malignant force that can consume someone's mind, body and soul. The films take it one step further, that if someone dies in a state of rage or anguish, their spirit lives on to torment everyone who forms a connection to them.





JU-ON was completely non-linear and seemed to wholly ignore any plot progression that you'd find in a Syd Field book. There was no first, second and third act. Rather, the film played like a series of vignettes. It came complete with title cards named after the person we would follow for the next five to ten minutes, before the film moved onto someone else. THE GRUDGE follows a more linear approach, but just barely.



Sarah Michelle Gellar plays Karen Davis (no relation), a home care specialist assigned to her first solo job after another girl fails to report to work. She heads off to a house only to be confronted by the overall eeriness of the situation. The people she encounters, the strange things she sees all lead up to a horrible confrontation and she knows she has been touched by something truly evil. The film then goes into a series of flashbacks that describe what has happened to the former occupants of the house. Even being connected to the family or stepping foot into the house makes you a target of this creature and there is no safe refuge. One by one, the grudge consumes them and we are forced to watch. It is never made clear what the grudge does. Some appear to die of fright, while others are mutilated or just absorbed. That we can't put a finger on what makes this monster tick is part of what makes the whole concept so unsettling. The film is episodic, and okay it doesn't always work. Each person deals with a slow build as the terror just escalates and escalates finally reaching a fever pitch. But all is not well after that. THE GRUDGE is a film that does not let you catch much of a breath. We witness these horrific moments only to have the cycle immediately begin again with someone else. In this regard, the film is very much like its source material.



What is different is that the mystery is clearer. JU-ON offered very few answers and it was not always easy to tell what was going on. That was part of what made is so creepy, but even I had to admit it was a little frustrating. We left the film with shreds of an idea, but no clear picture as to what happened. The remake balances this out more. It is now possible to leave the theatre, knowing the who and the why if not the how. It offers explanations, but is still vague enough to leave a lot to our imaginations, no doubt knowing we would rack our brains over several macabre details hence scaring ourselves all the more. There is also a more natural progression to the story. While the original didn't have a lead to speak of, we regularly return to Gellar's character here. She fills in a lot of the holes as she investigates the nature of the grudge, tracing it all to the house (the fact that it is essentially a haunted house movie is also something new). There is an increased urgency so that the film doesn't simply jump from person to person before ending (although I must say that the ending on display here is quite disappointing). By the closing moments of the film, Gellar is racing for her life and we're running with her.



Fortunately, she has the acting chops to pull this one off. This is her first post-BUFFY solo project and the first time she's had to carry a film solo since SIMPLY IRRESISTIBLE. As Karen, she begins the film as someone naive and optimistic yet unsure of herself. As the film progresses, she is at first terrified and then slowly becomes almost numb with fear. The film's use of character is great. Very few people stay on screen very long before getting their grudge on, but we get to know them anyway. The film is subtle and precise enough that we feel we know each character. THE GRUDGE does a better job at characterization than many slasher films who have 90 full minutes and still come up short. However the nature of Asian horror, even when translated to English, is what isn't said. Most of the performances work through restraint, so don't expect any big Oscar speeches and don't expect many publications to appreciate the fine cast. By the way, this is a cast that is a virtual who's who of talented and underrated performers - Clea DuVall (underrated star of many equally underrated horror and indie projects), KaDee Strickland (ANACONDAS: THE HUNT FOR THE BLOOD ORCHID, much better than you'd expect), Bill Pullman (criminally overlooked in ZERO EFFECT), Ted Raimi (best work to date) and Ryo Ishibashi (AUDITION, and thank God his wounds have healed).



But if the Asian sensibility that less is more translates to the script and the performances, it sadly does not work with the special effects. Like Gore Verbinski's THE RING, it is still a fine film but like Verbinski's film it also adds a bit too much flash. Each scare is represented by a "sting" on the soundtrack, when half the time we would have been better off without. Sound was a central element of terror in the original and it is here too, but it does lose some of it's charm. A perfect example is the croaking sound from JU-ON. It was something amazingly basic, able to be imitated by just about anyone (I imagine that made for some spooky crank calls in Japan). But the way it was placed in the story was so perfect that is scared the living daylights out of us. The croak is still present in the American version, but it has been further distorted by static and digital sound effects. The joys of ProTools have made it into THE GRUDGE and it just feels a bit more fabricated than it should. Likewise, while digital effects created the long black cascading hair and lifeforce of the grudge in JU-ON, here they pump it up a bit more, adding flickers and shadow effects that are actually less effective.



Which is not to say the film isn't scary. Trust me, it is. When I saw JU-ON, I told anyone that would listen that if the remake were half as creepy, it would be a smash hit. Thankfully, the film is probably around three-quarters as creepy and THE GRUDGE has turned out to be a success that has stunned everyone except myself and a cult of loyal fans. This film offers scares, real honest-to-goodness scares. There are a lot of sudden jolts here, and jolt me they did. Have you ever jumped back with so much force, it feels like you took the theatre seat a few inches with you? THE GRUDGE made me do that and more than once.



It would be difficult to remake this film for an American market, so the question was how Shimizu would make the transition stateside. In a simple yet unprecedented move, he didn't. THE GRUDGE still takes place in Tokyo, Japan. The cast is mostly American. In fact, it seems like every poor yank within a ten block radius of this center of evil winds up as meat for the beast. But in addition to this, it adds a subtle new dimension to the story. There is a definite feeling of culture clash. The Americans are out of their element, and realize that the world is bigger and more diverse than they could have imagined. The Americans in the story stick to their own. Most of their friends, lovers and immediate superiors also hail from the west. An unfortunate bit of irony is that this continues into the actual marketing of the film. The studio, oblivious to the ramifications, has listed all English speaking actors first, even if some of their roles are smaller than members of the Japanese cast.



Regardless, the effect on screen is powerful. In one sequence, Clea DuVall searches through the grocery store only to find she cannot read any of the labels. She goes to the ramen noodle aisle, a favorite dish of college students and impoverished Horror Express writers. Still, she cannot distinguish the labels. She must poke a hole in one of the containers, sniffing the package for something familiar. To her relief she finds it and rather than go through the whole ordeal again, she simply loads her basket full of the noodles like a scene out of LA FEMME NIKITA. In another sequence, Sarah Michelle Gellar asks for directions. While the woman she asks is helpful, her child is frightened, shying away from her. The message at this point in the story is clear: you are a pleasant but dangerous person to be around, ill prepared to deal with what's coming.



Shimizu deserves credit for doing what few directors could. This is his fifth attempt at tackling the same material. Each time, he winds up with something that is just different enough to keep things interesting, while relishing in a talent for the horrific. Shimizu will next move onto something else, a completely original horror film again made in his native Japan. Hopefully, we is not a one trick pony. The time has come for him to branch out, frightening us with new worlds and new tapestries of terror. If my hopes are justified and he really is the new talent to watch, then THE GRUDGE could be just the beginning.

liverpoolred
11-10-2004, 10:15 AM
I haven't seen it yet, I'll probably go tomorrow night with someone that hasn't seen the original, I'm looking forward to seeing the audience reaction as much as the changes that have been made.

I overheard two girls talking about it the other day saying it was the scariest film they've ever seen. Sounds good.

Thanks for the review.

bloodspiller
11-10-2004, 03:14 PM
Same here liverpoolred, on Halloween two girls in know attempted to watch it but only got through half the film because it was apparently too creepy and scary. I wanna see it, those kids meowing........ <_<

liverpoolred
11-16-2004, 06:22 AM
I saw it and to be honest I wasn't that impressed. It started well and there were some really good new scenes but towards the middle it dipped quite a bit and I felt it was too repetetive. Also they completely ommited some of the scariest scenes from the original which I thought was pretty strange.

For a remake it was decent but for anyone that hasn't seen the Grudge or Juon I suggest you watch Juon first.

DevilMan
02-13-2005, 06:59 AM
I watched THE GRUDGE the other day and honestly, I was really disappointed by it. I had such high and grand hopes that Takashi Shimizu would have perfected what he had done in his three previous films, and given a nice fat Hollywood budget, I thought he could have churned out the ultimate version of his popular spook franchise. But no, what we got instead was a watered down, almost boring attempt to recycle sequences from his other movies without adding any real flair to them at all.

The original JUON was captivating and scary (a rare thing these days), and it had you strapped in on a thrill-a-moment rollercoaster ride of supernatural shocks. THE GRUDGE, on the other hand, simply plodded along without a care in the world. The tension was now gone. The eerie feeling was now gone. The "scare moments" that you were waiting for never came.

Now granted, I knew THE GRUDGE was going to be a remake of JUON so I expected to see things that had already happened in the other three movies. But considering that I thought THE RING was an excellent if not almost a frame-by-frame redo of RINGU, I just knew THE GRUDGE was gonna impress because the man that created the series was at the directing helm. Unfortunately, it just didn't.

Another thing I thought that came up lame in the remake was Sarah Michelle Gellar's role, and/or acting on her part. After just rewatching the first JUON THE GRUDGE again, I really felt that Megumi Okina did a much better job overall. I remember that I was honestly worried about her and hoped that she might somehow get outta the mess that was going on around her. As for our former vampire slayer, I never really cared one way or the other. Maybe I just expected her to jump up and whip kick the ghost's ass, and she didn't. I don't know.

All in all, THE GRUDGE, to me, was a pale imitation of a truely fantastic film. THE GRUDGE bordered on generic step-by-step horror formula patterns and did absolutely nothing to excel or further the franchise's future other than making some people in Hollywood a big wad of cash. Here's hoping that the Japanese JUON 3 and the Hollywood sequel, THE GRUDGE 2 tries for something new and exciting.

I agree with LIVERPOOLRED, if you're interested in the series, do yourself a favor and watch the original Japanese JUON THE GRUDGE first.

-Steve

versus
02-19-2005, 03:48 AM
Im buying it, I've seen the original. In the US remake do you still hear her neck and back creak as she comes down the the stairs? Did you know Hideo Sakai (Versus) is in Juon, as the social worker who finds that man in the trolly thing.

DevilMan
02-20-2005, 09:45 AM
Originally posted by versus@Feb 19 2005, 10:48 AM
...in the us remake do you still hear her necck and back creak as she comes down the the stairs.
Yup, along with the cat screeching and that eerie gurgling noise that Kayako the murderous ghost makes. But still, it's sadly not nearly as scary as the original.

-Steve

versus
02-26-2005, 03:09 AM
I think she looks scarier in the US remake.

DevilMan
02-27-2005, 10:38 AM
Originally posted by versus@Feb 26 2005, 10:09 AM
I think she looks scarier in the US remake. Better makeup perhaps but that's about it though.

Kinda like the remake of THE RING. Samara's Hollywood makeup was better than the original Japanese Sadako but that's where the difference ends in my opinion.

-Steve

DevilMan
05-22-2005, 11:59 AM
Picked up the new "Extended Edition" of THE GRUDGE. Gonna watch it tonight and compare...

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0007YXQEG.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

-Steve

JohnShaft
03-31-2006, 08:14 AM
I've gotta say I agree with DM on this one.

I've seen the original TV movie, and not the movie versions, but the US remake just felt like a series of montages to me also. I didn't feel involved in the story, or the characters, because there was no throughline. Their was no real protagonist to act as the viewers viewpoint of the movie. And it therefore just had nowhere to go. It was "this happens, then this happens" all the way to the end.

I know Scott mentioned there was no acts, but it pretended like it wanted to tell the story in a conventional structure, it just didn't. Unlike the TV version, you had a lead character. She just didn't lead, and wasn't in the movie enough. They either should have kept it with unconnected montages or made a conventional movie with a conventional structure.

I think this "having your cake and eating it" problem came from forcing a far Eastern director, who are want to be unconvential by Western standards, and forcing him into the US system where every executive uses Syd Field's book as bible, and force the conventional structure on everything.

So for me it was a failure. It didn't decide whether to be "Eastern or Western" and ended up being neither.

pmshayley
04-04-2006, 02:35 PM
This should be in the most over-rated movie thread...

Yes, it had a few scares in it, and the makeup was creepy, but this film had me laughing when I was not supposed to. And the ending...why not just throw the word "SEQUEL" up on the screen in big flashing letters? I like Sarah Gellar---in BUFFY. Re-making japanese horror is a trend Hollywoodie needs to get away from. I am not saying the source material sucks; on the contrary, the original films are great. But most are not readily available, and some are only released here after the re-make has it's way. This one was bad, DARK WATER was bad, and RING II had me laughing so hard that every time I see a deer I start screaming, between fits of uncontrollable laughter, "DRIVE FASTER, RACHEL, DRIVE FASTER!"

Ugh. Rachel pull the car over, I'm gonna hurl...

Carmilla
04-04-2006, 09:48 PM
Re-making japanese horror is a trend Hollywoodie needs to get away from.

I couldn't agree more. The japanese films are great already, so no need to re-make them. Is it because the regular American audience is so reluctant to watch foreign films? Subtitles are not that bad. Really.

Because otherwise, I don't see what's the whole point... Unless there's a horror movie to support somehow and they have absolutely ran out of ideas, which is even sadder.

This re-make of the Grudge didn't do justice to the original. I didn't mind the linear way of telling the story. Perhaps I would have enjoyed it more if I hadn't been comparing it to the original the whole time. But it's impossible not to do that.

Bloody Mary
04-04-2006, 10:21 PM
To me, I feel that there is a great difference in the cultural filming sensibilities between the US and Japan. Somehow, I get this aura that was given off from it. Ooooohhh...psychic powers. Just kidding. :D Anyway, I totally agree with what Carmilla says. To be honest, I was actually excited to see the film because of its' whole opportunity thing and then there were rude comments in the theaters saying "Oh, come on! Is that it?", "It's not even scary", or "It sucked". It's so that Takashi Shimizu's greatest film is ruined by an American remake. Comparing to the original it seemd to somehow pull me in. Of course it somewhat like Joseph Hayden's music where it gets slow and sleepy and then it just wakes you up like da-DUM! :eek:

Also, I hear that they are going to a sequel to that movie "The Grudge 2" yet another remake of "Ju-On 2". I saw the japanese trailer of it and it seemed a little more frightning and agressive than I expected. There was one thing that was bugging me though. The previous actress who plays Kayako is somethere but not sure if it is the same woman. I still looking forward for it to be released in US licensing.

pmshayley
04-05-2006, 08:53 AM
Carmilla--One of the general problems here in the US is sheer laziness. No one wants to read subtitles; they would rather listen to the horrid dubbing in English. Now, I am not accussing the entire population of the US of being like this; obviously Bloody Mary is not like that, nor am I, nor are several other Americans on this site. But I think they will agree with me when I say that Japanese horror gets no mainstream release in the US because most Americans are just too lazy to read subtitles. Or, they have a problem with multi-tasking, which is what they would encounter at a theatre if they had to read subtitles and eat popcorn at the same time.:eek:

JohnShaft
04-05-2006, 12:00 PM
Carmilla--One of the general problems here in the US is sheer laziness. No one wants to read subtitles; they would rather listen to the horrid dubbing in English. That's my belief too (and it also applies to the UK). It's a sad indictment of the times. People might say "this would always have been the case". Well it wasn't going back to silent movies. I do think the laziness quotient has gone up in the Western World, there's just so many labour saving devices (from household appliances to cars) that people just can't be fucked anymore.

I don't suppose it will change. In fact I can only imagine it will get worse. I don't have a high opinion of the general movie going public.

Carmilla
04-05-2006, 10:54 PM
most Americans are just too lazy to read subtitles. Or, they have a problem with multi-tasking, which is what they would encounter at a theatre if they had to read subtitles and eat popcorn at the same time.:eek:

<img> Oh boy. I didn't realise what I was asking for!

I'm waaay to used to subtitles and I prefer them over dubbing ANY DAY. But the sheer laziness must be really important if someone decides to do the film all over again just because of language. That, and the movie industry is just too big.

As for The Grudge 2, I guess it was only a matter of time. IMDB announces it for 2006.

pmshayley
04-06-2006, 08:57 AM
Here in the US, there are few locations to see a foreign film unless it is released mainstream. New York and Los Angeles are pretty much the only cities to have more than one "art house"--that is what we polished Americans refer to theatres that show foreign films as. Even then, the films that come in at my local "art house" are along the lines of "Il Postino" or "Y Tu Mamma Tambien"--no horror. Well, on Halloween, the Tampa Theatre pulls out PHANTOM OF THE OPERA and hires an organist, and that is pretty cool, but that's about it. Hollywood sees what makes money in another country, and decides to make some of it's own. It became a tremendous problem after a little film called "Woman on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown"(I think the original was a movie from Mexico). There had been a few remakes before that, but that one started it off. The popularity of re-making foreign films spiked, and now it seems to have torpedo'd into just the horror films. Most video stores have the originals, but only after the American film has come out. Netflix is another way to get them, but the problem lies in being able to see the film the way it was originally intended: on a big frickin' movie screen.

I have the feeling that if I ever take a vacation to Europe(or South America), I will be spending most of my time in the theatres...

Bloody Mary
04-06-2006, 11:31 AM
Hey guys found the Japanese trailer for the Ju-On 2:

Click on http://www.filmhorizon.com/fh-media/TheGrudge2_512.asx

Carmilla
04-07-2006, 10:43 PM
Nothing beats that creaking sound... Never as good as the first one.

Something I always wanted to know: Ju On 1 -- The version divided in episodes is the TV version? (The one that lasts like 1 hour and 10 minutes?)

Libra
05-14-2006, 05:01 AM
damn, i havent seen the original yet .. but i most def will after reading what u guys have written .. i liked the US version tho .. it was tyte ..